首页> 外文OA文献 >A Comparison of High-Performance Football Coaches Experiencing High- Versus Low-Burnout Symptoms Across a Season of Play : Quality of Motivation and Recovery Matters
【2h】

A Comparison of High-Performance Football Coaches Experiencing High- Versus Low-Burnout Symptoms Across a Season of Play : Quality of Motivation and Recovery Matters

机译:整个赛季中高性能足球教练经历过爆发性症状与低爆发性症状的比较:动机和康复的质量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of the current study was to provide insights in how and why four head coaches in elite football experienced being either high or low in burnout symptoms (BS) during a competitive season. A longitudinal sequential quantitative-qualitative mixed method approach was used to enhance the understanding of coaches' experiences. First, data were collected using online questionnaires at the start and at the end of the competitive season with all coaches working at the Norwegian Elite Football League level. Second, in-depth interviews were conducted with four head coaches who were purposefully selected based on having the two highest and the two lowest burnout scores across the season compared with the overall sample. A quantitative approach was used to explore whether these four coaches differed when compared with the overall population on the associated variables: performance, budget, quality of motivation, perceived workload, work-home-interference (WHI), and recovery. A qualitative approach helped gain more insight in the experiences these four coaches had with possible onset variables. Analyses comparing the two sets of coaches, indicated no difference related to performance, budget and workload. However, the motivational profile, WHI, and ability to meet recovery demands were variables that contributed to explain differences in coaches' BS.
机译:本研究的目的是提供洞察力,以了解为什么四个精英教练在一个竞争性赛季中,倦怠症状(BS)偏高或偏低。纵向顺序定量-定性混合方法方法用于增强对教练经验的理解。首先,在竞赛赛季开始和结束时使用在线问卷收集数据,所有教练均在挪威精英足球联赛级别工作。其次,对四位主教练进行了深度采访,他们是根据整个季节与整个样本相比在职业倦怠方面得分最高的两个和最低的两个而选择的。在相关变量:绩效,预算,动机质量,可感知的工作量,家庭工作干扰(WHI)和恢复能力等方面,采用定量方法来探讨这四个教练与总人数是否存在差异。定性方法有助于对这四位教练的经验和可能的发病变量有更多的了解。比较两组教练的分析表明,在绩效,预算和工作量方面没有差异。但是,动机,WHI和满足恢复需求的能力是变量,这些变量有助于解释教练的BS差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号